Assessing DFID’s results in improving maternal health

DFID programmes have expanded access to family planning and some maternal health services, but a renewed effort is required to reach young women and girls and to generate lasting impacts on quality of care and maternal health outcomes.

Score: Amber/Red
  1. Status: Completed
  2. Published: 30 October 2018
  3. Type: Impact review
  4. Subject: Global health, Women and girls
  5. Assessment: Amber/Red
  6. Location: Democratic Republic of Congo, Malawi
  7. Lead commissioner: Alison Evans
  8. SDGs covered:Good health and wellbeing

Read the review

Review

This review found that DFID programmes have expanded access to family planning and some maternal health services, but a renewed effort is required to reach young women and girls and to generate lasting impacts on quality of care and maternal health outcomes. We made five recommendations and awarded an amber-red score.

Findings

  • DFID developed a comprehensive Results Framework for 2011-2015 that included targets to improve maternal health.
  • DFID has been an important champion of family planning and reproductive rights at the international level, and helped to extend access to family planning to nearly 10 million women and girls during the Results Framework period. However, its maternal health portfolio was not well balanced across family planning, health services and other interventions so as to maximise impact in the medium- and long-term. In the face of severe shortages of skilled personnel, equipment and supplies, DFID has struggled to raise service quality to the extent needed to improve maternal health outcomes.
  • We were unable to confirm DFID’s global results claim on saving maternal lives, owing to shortcomings in the way it estimated the impacts of its programmes.
  • DFID’s policies prioritised reaching poor and young women but only a few programmes identified specific mechanisms or set targets for reaching these key groups. Furthermore, very few programmes disaggregated their results, making it impossible to determine the impact of DFID programming on poor, young or otherwise hard-to-reach women and girls.
  • DFID has been a strong advocate for women’s and girls’ rights internationally but could do more to reinforce this at community level in priority countries.
  • We found that DFID’s maternal health programming during the Results Framework period had a limited focus on the long-term development of health system infrastructure and institutions.
  • DFID has begun to adapt its maternal health programming in response to learning, and the design of some new programmes suggests that lessons from the Results Framework period are being applied.

Recommendations

  1. As part of its commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals, DFID should develop a long-term approach to improving maternal health, planning through to 2030 in focus countries with high maternal mortality. These plans should focus on improved quality and continuity of care, cross-sectoral interventions and efforts to empower women and girls.
  2. DFID should clarify its approach to health systems strengthening, prioritising improvements in the availability and accessibility of good quality, respectful care for women and their babies.
  3. DFID should directly monitor the impact of its sexual, reproductive and maternal health services programmes on adolescents and the poorest women. This means including design features in programmes that target adolescents and the poorest women, monitoring whether they are effective and adjusting course where they are not.
  4. When using models to generate outcome data, DFID should test its assumptions and triangulate its results claims using other quantitative and qualitative data.
  5. As part of its commitment to the Sustainable Development Goal data revolution, DFID should prioritise and invest in international and country-level efforts to gather data on the quality of maternal health services and outcomes, including disaggregated data relating to key target groups.

 

Read the news story

Timeline

Approach

Published 24 Jan 2018

Evidence gathering

Complete

Review publication

Published 30 October 2018

Government response

Published 5 December 2018

Parliamentary scrutiny

IDC hearing 19 December 2018

ICAI follow-up

Published 23 July 2020

Further follow-up

Published 23 June 2021

Further follow-up

Published 30 June 2022