Rapid review of DFID’s Smart Rules

A rapid review of DFID's procedures for programme management, the Smart Rules, to see how they respond to the issues that we have raised in our 38 reports to date.

  1. Status: Completed
  2. Published: 16 December 2014
  3. Type: Rapid review
  4. Subject: Government processes and systems
  5. Assessment: Unrated
  6. Lead commissioner: Mark Foster

Read the review

Review

There is evidence that some aspects of poor design and delivery observed in our ICAI reports have been tackled. For instance, where, previously, programmes had to meet 200 requirements, these have been trimmed down to 37 rules. We made five recommendations.

Recommendations

  1. DFID needs to continue to refine the Smart Rules to facilitate ease of use by teams in the field, with a particular focus on clearer principles, focused technical guidance and examples of where discretion can be applied.
  2. The Smart Rules need to be enhanced in key areas to meet critical challenges identified by ICAI:
    • Be more explicit about intended beneficiary involvement;
    • Clarify the relationship between value for money, sustainability and impact;
    • Ensure a consistent approach to risk, adaptation and learning;
    • Enable mobilisation and increased realism in planning; and
    • Make senior staff (such as heads of office) specifically accountable for continuous learning.
  3. DFID needs to maintain the momentum of the change programme which has arisen from the End to End review and continue to engage all departments in a dynamic transformation focused on improving the impact of UK aid on the poor.
  4. DFID leadership needs to define a compelling vision and mission for the organisation for the next decade, focused on reducing poverty for beneficiaries and use this to establish some explicit principles for the overall transformation ahead.
  5. DFID needs to continue to leverage its leadership role in the global aid community to streamline overall system effectiveness and improve collaboration between partners.

 

Read the news story

Timeline

Review publication

Published 16 December 2014

Government response

Published 19 January 2015

ICAI follow-up

Published 30 June 2016