ANNEX: USE OF CONTRACTORS REPORT: FINDINGS OF THE SURVEY OF DFID STAFF AND CONTRACTORS
Methodology
This survey was carried out between 30th December 2012 and 31st January 2013. Those invited to complete the on-line survey included:
people directly involved with the case studies (DFID and contractors);
others from DFID with relevant perspectives at policy or procurement level; and
people from the Development Forum, a group representing contractors.
We collected the survey results on an anonymous basis.
Survey Results
Q1. About you:
Response distribution:
I am a DFID employee: 42
I am a current DFID contractor: 80
Other: 3
Chart showing respondent distribution by type
Q2. Contractors generally deliver programmes more efficiently than DFID can alone.
Response
DFID
NON DFID
Strongly Agree
19%
60%
Agree
38%
33%
Neutral
26%
4%
Disagree
17%
1%
Strongly Disagree
0%
2%
Q3. Contractors generally deliver programmes more effectively than DFID can alone.
Response
DFID
NON DFID
Strongly Agree
14%
63%
Agree
45%
29%
Neutral
29%
6%
Disagree
12%
1%
Strongly Disagree
0%
1%
Q4. DFID usually receives competitive prices from its contractors.
Response
DFID
NON DFID
Strongly Agree
5%
49%
Agree
40%
34%
Neutral
33%
13%
Disagree
19%
1%
Strongly Disagree
2%
2%
Q5. DFID delivers more sustainable solutions through its use of contractors than DFID can alone.
Response
DFID
NON DFID
Strongly Agree
14%
48%
Agree
50%
35%
Neutral
19%
12%
Disagree
17%
4%
Strongly Disagree
0%
1%
Q6. DFID generally obtains good value for the money it spends with contractors.
Response
DFID
NON DFID
Strongly Agree
7%
42%
Agree
60%
41%
Neutral
24%
12%
Disagree
10%
2%
Strongly Disagree
0%
2%
Q7. DFID’s current planning processes for contractor-delivered programmes give the marketplace a sufficiently early sight of future programmes.
Response
DFID
NON DFID
Strongly Agree
0%
1%
Agree
62%
34%
Neutral
14%
20%
Disagree
19%
30%
Strongly Disagree
5%
14%
Q8. DFID’s current planning processes for contractor-delivered programmes enable contractors to contribute effectively to the scope of programmes before formal tender.
Response
DFID
NON DFID
Strongly Agree
0%
0%
Agree
17%
8%
Neutral
48%
34%
Disagree
31%
39%
Strongly Disagree
5%
19%
Q9. DFID’s current planning processes for contractor-delivered programmes optimize the balance and blend of local and international experience and capability.
Response
DFID
NON DFID
Strongly Agree
2%
1%
Agree
50%
33%
Neutral
31%
48%
Disagree
17%
17%
Strongly Disagree
0%
1%
Q10. DFID’s current planning processes for contractor-delivered programmes highlight potential delivery risks early enough in the planning cycle.
Response
DFID
NON DFID
Strongly Agree
7%
1%
Agree
62%
45%
Neutral
21%
18%
Disagree
7%
31%
Strongly Disagree
2%
5%
Q11. DFID’s current planning processes for contractor-delivered programmes result in sufficient consultation with beneficiaries in programme design, implementation and evaluation of projects.
Response
DFID
NON DFID
Strongly Agree
10%
0%
Agree
38%
16%
Neutral
33%
52%
Disagree
14%
27%
Strongly Disagree
5%
6%
Q12. DFID makes rigorous capacity assessments of aid recipients and non-state actors, before commissioning a contractor-delivered programme.