The UK’s approach to funding the UN humanitarian system
DFID has a strong strategy for using its funding and influence to strengthen UN humanitarian agencies and global humanitarian practice, but its record to date in promoting practical reforms is mixed.
![Score: Green/Amber](https://icai.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/green-amber-145x145.png)
Read the approach paper
- PDF download (85 KB)
- Published: 10 May 2018
Our approach
This review looks at how well DFID has used its position as a major donor to improve the value for money and effectiveness of humanitarian aid spent through UN agencies.
The review set out to focus on core funding – that is, unconditional funds paid to the central budgets of UN agencies, which can be allocated flexibly for central functions or to particular emergencies. The methodology included a strategic review, UN organisational reviews, and country and thematic case studies.
Review questions
The review answers the following review questions:
- To what extent have DFID’s choices of funding channels and mechanisms for UN humanitarian agencies been relevant to its strategy and objectives for strengthening the humanitarian system?
- Has DFID’s funding of UN humanitarian agencies led to improvements in their individual management, practices, capabilities and performance?
- Is DFID’s funding of and influence on UN humanitarian agencies likely to strengthen the overall performance of the international humanitarian system?