UK development assistance for security and justice

Review

While there are pockets of success, there is little sign that the Department for International Development’s (DFID) institutional development work is leading to wider improvements in security and justice outcomes for the poor. Consequently, we have given a rating of amber-red and made two recommendations.

Findings

Our review found that many of the activities in DFID’s security and justice programmes are not making enough of a difference to the lives of people living in poverty. We believe that there is a need for critical reflection, both on the overall goals of the portfolio and on what objectives are realistic in complex operating environments.

We are concerned that the security and justice programmes suffer from a lack of management attention, which has led to unclear objectives and poor supervision of implementers. The lack of overall strategy has led to a repetition of a standard set of interventions, such as investing in model police stations, across very different contexts without a clear strategic or evidence based rationale.

Recommendations

1. DFID should develop a new strategy for more focussed and realistic security and justice assistance that emphasises tackling specific security and justice challenges in particular and local contexts. This should include working in a cross-disciplinary way to address wider security and justice themes, such as gender equality (including working with men), labour rights and urban insecurity.
2. DFID should identify the key evidence gaps across its security and justice portfolio and tailor its investments in research and innovation to fill those gaps. It should develop guidelines on how to ground programme design in sound contextual analysis and evidence of what works and on how to strengthen programme oversight, including management of political risk.