DFID: Programme controls and assurance in Afghanistan

This review assesses DFID’s systems of control and assurance over its expenditure in Afghanistan.

Score: Amber/Red
  1. Status: Completed
  2. Published: 22 March 2012
  3. Type: Other
  4. Subject: Country focus, Fragile states
  5. Assessment: Amber/Red
  6. Location: Afghanistan
  7. Lead commissioner: Graham Ward CBE

Read the review

Review

This review assessed the Department for International Development’s (DFID) systems of control and assurance over its expenditure in Afghanistan. We awarded an amber-red score and made four recommendations.

Findings

DFID manages its programmes in Afghanistan in exceptionally difficult circumstances. It has a highly committed, respected and experienced senior team and a professional reputation amongst other organisations working in Afghanistan. We found, however, that DFID’s financial management processes are insufficiently robust and that DFID does not give sufficient importance to identifying and managing risks in the design and delivery of its programmes.

Recommendations

  1. DFID should make explicit in its funding decisions how it is assessing and taking into account the risk of leakage and balancing that risk against the benefits the programmes are designed to deliver.
  2. DFID needs to deploy people with more financial and procurement skills to improve its financial grip and reduce risk. It should focus its financial resources on improving its understanding and reporting of cost throughout the delivery chain.
  3. DFID should strengthen its managing agent agreements by specifying the levels of controls and assurance that it expects to be in place and monitoring whether or not these standards are met.
  4. DFID should ensure that its office in Afghanistan implements outstanding NAO and PAC recommendations regarding fraud and corruption.

 

Read the news story

Timeline

Review publication

Published 22 March 2012

Government response

Published 16 April 2012

ICAI follow-up

Published 1 July 2013