The Newton Fund
The £735 million aid fund is poorly designed to deliver its primary purpose of addressing development challenges and advancing development for the poorest people and countries through research and innovation, and does not ensure its spending is a good use of UK aid.
International Development Committee
Following the government’s response, this review typically would have been the subject of an oral evidence session in front of Parliament’s International Development Committee (IDC), or its ICAI sub-Committee. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Committee instead took evidence from ICAI, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) in writing before publishing its conclusions.
ICAI follow-up
ICAI follows up on all of its reviews to check what progress has been made since publication.
ICAI’s Newton Fund follow-up is available to read now. We rated the government’s progress towards meeting the recommendations for our Newton Fund review as ‘inadequate’.
We found that governance and oversight mechanisms had been strengthened, and there had been substantial improvement on gender equality, diversity and inclusion. However, there had been little attention to addressing ICAI’s core concerns over the Fund’s primary purpose, development impact or tied aid.
Read the follow-up
- HTML document
- PDF download (104 KB)
- Published: 23 Jul 2020
Further follow-up
We returned to the Newton Fund through the next follow-up process, which was published in June 2021. We found that the changes that have been made to improve the Fund’s approaches to ODA compliance and assurance, and the changes to how the Fund monitors, evaluates and learns, are very positive and indicative of a significant amount of work.
Read the further follow-up
- HTML document
- PDF download (486 KB)
- Published: 23 Jun 2021