UK aid to Ukraine
A review exploring the full range of UK aid to Ukraine since the February 2022 Russian invasion.
Read the review
- HTML document
- PDF download (1 MB)
- Published: 30 Apr 2024
Read the annotated bibliography
- HTML document
- PDF download (12 MB)
- Published: 30 Apr 2024
Review
This review found that the UK has mounted an effective and flexible civilian aid response after the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, but that post-war reconstruction will need careful management.
Findings
- UK aid has been effective and adaptive in responding to the crisis in Ukraine, providing £228 million in bilateral assistance in 2023-24 and £4 billion in loan guarantees over five years.
- Giving aid to trusted partners enabled fast mobilisation of support, including targeted assistance for vulnerable populations.
- Large loan guarantees are crucial to help Ukraine carry on functioning as a state, but mean the UK has taken on significant liabilities that could impact the aid budget in future.
- The international community should improve engagement with local civil society organisations on the ground, who found it hard to access funding.
- There are high corruption risks in post-war reconstruction which must be managed appropriately.
- The UK has used initiatives like the 2023 Ukraine Recovery Conference in London to seek and rally support from other governments and the private sector.
Recommendations
- FCDO should intensify its support for localisation of the coordination and delivery of the humanitarian response in Ukraine.
- The design of future FCDO programmes should encompass programming options for different scenarios and the ability to adapt quickly when circumstances change.
- FCDO should strengthen its third-party monitoring and audit arrangements in Ukraine by adding specialist capacity to identify and investigate fraud, corruption and diversion risks to UK aid (including guarantees) across the country portfolio.
- Based on lessons from other post-conflict settings, FCDO’s new anti-corruption programming should include a focus on helping Ukraine’s independent anti-corruption bodies to identify and manage corruption risks associated with large-scale reconstruction.